Volkswagen Polo III (6N) or Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)?
1994–2001 vs 2001–2009 · Hatchback 5-door/Hatchback 3-door/Sedan/Wagon vs Hatchback 5-door/Hatchback 3-door
In short
- Length: Polo III (6N) 4,285 mm, Polo IV (9N) 3,916 mm — a 37 cm difference.
- Boot: Polo III (6N) 455 l, Polo IV (9N) 270 l.
- Lowest consumption: Polo III (6N) 4.6 l/100 km, Polo IV (9N) 4.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Polo III (6N) 37–92 kW, Polo IV (9N) 40–110 kW.
- Standard equipment: Polo III (6N) 11 items (CL), Polo IV (9N) 17 items (Trendline).
- On Autodrom: Polo IV (9N) from €7,000 (1 listing); no Polo III (6N) is listed right now.
Volkswagen Polo III (6N)1994–2001 · 10 engines · CL, GL, Trendline, ComfortlineSpecifications →Listings →
Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)2001–2009 · 10 engines · Trendline, Comfortline, Highline, SportlineSpecifications →1 listing from €7,000 →
better value
Volkswagen Polo III (6N)
1994–2001
Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)
2001–2009
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Volkswagen Polo III (6N) or Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)?
Length: Volkswagen Polo III (6N) 4,285 mm, Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) 3,916 mm (a 369 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,443 vs 2,460 mm. Boot: 455 vs 270 l.
Which uses less fuel — Volkswagen Polo III (6N) or Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)?
The most frugal Volkswagen Polo III (6N) uses 4.6 l/100 km (1.4 TDI); the most frugal Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) 4.5 l/100 km (1.4 TDI 80).
Which is more powerful — Volkswagen Polo III (6N) or Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)?
The strongest Volkswagen Polo III (6N) makes 92 kW (125 hp) (1.6 GTI); the strongest Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) 110 kW (150 hp) (1.8 T GTI).