Suzuki Swift II (SF) or Volkswagen Polo II (86C)?
1990–2003 vs 1981–1994 · Hatchback 3-door/Hatchback 5-door vs Hatchback 3-door
In short
- Length: Swift II (SF) 3,745 mm, Polo II (86C) 3,725 mm — a 2 cm difference.
- Boot: Swift II (SF) 190 l, Polo II (86C) 215 l.
- Lowest consumption: Swift II (SF) 5.9 l/100 km, Polo II (86C) 5.2 l/100 km.
- Power: Swift II (SF) 39–74 kW, Polo II (86C) 33–83 kW.
- Standard equipment: Swift II (SF) 8 items (GA), Polo II (86C) 9 items (CL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Suzuki Swift II (SF)
1990–2003
Volkswagen Polo II (86C)
1981–1994
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Suzuki Swift II (SF) or Volkswagen Polo II (86C)?
Length: Suzuki Swift II (SF) 3,745 mm, Volkswagen Polo II (86C) 3,725 mm (a 20 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,265 vs 2,335 mm. Boot: 190 vs 215 l.
Which uses less fuel — Suzuki Swift II (SF) or Volkswagen Polo II (86C)?
The most frugal Suzuki Swift II (SF) uses 5.9 l/100 km (1.0); the most frugal Volkswagen Polo II (86C) 5.2 l/100 km (1.4 D).
Which is more powerful — Suzuki Swift II (SF) or Volkswagen Polo II (86C)?
The strongest Suzuki Swift II (SF) makes 74 kW (101 hp) (1.3 GTi); the strongest Volkswagen Polo II (86C) 83 kW (113 hp) (1.3 G40).