Renault Clio II or Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)?
1998–2005 vs 2001–2009 · Hatchback 5-door/Hatchback 3-door vs Hatchback 5-door/Hatchback 3-door
In short
- Length: Clio II 3,835 mm, Polo IV (9N) 3,916 mm — a 8 cm difference.
- Boot: Clio II 255 l, Polo IV (9N) 270 l.
- Lowest consumption: Clio II 4.3 l/100 km, Polo IV (9N) 4.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Clio II 43–188 kW, Polo IV (9N) 40–110 kW.
- Standard equipment: Clio II 16 items (Authentique), Polo IV (9N) 17 items (Trendline).
- On Autodrom: Polo IV (9N) from €7,000 (1 listing); no Clio II is listed right now.
Renault Clio II1998–2005 · 10 engines · Authentique, Expression, Dynamique, PrivilegeSpecifications →Listings →
Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)2001–2009 · 10 engines · Trendline, Comfortline, Highline, SportlineSpecifications →1 listing from €7,000 →
better value
Renault Clio II
1998–2005
Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)
2001–2009
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Renault Clio II or Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)?
Length: Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) 3,916 mm, Renault Clio II 3,835 mm (a 81 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,460 vs 2,498 mm. Boot: 270 vs 255 l.
Which uses less fuel — Renault Clio II or Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)?
The most frugal Renault Clio II uses 4.3 l/100 km (1.5 dCi 100); the most frugal Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) 4.5 l/100 km (1.4 TDI 80).
Which is more powerful — Renault Clio II or Volkswagen Polo IV (9N)?
The strongest Renault Clio II makes 188 kW (256 hp) (3.0 V6 24V); the strongest Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) 110 kW (150 hp) (1.8 T GTI).