Nissan Micra K10 or Suzuki Swift II (SF)?
1982–1992 vs 1990–2003 · Hatchback 3-door/Hatchback 5-door vs Hatchback 3-door/Hatchback 5-door
In short
- Length: Micra K10 3,640 mm, Swift II (SF) 3,745 mm — a 11 cm difference.
- Lowest consumption: Micra K10 6.4 l/100 km, Swift II (SF) 5.9 l/100 km.
- Power: Micra K10 40–44 kW, Swift II (SF) 39–74 kW.
- Standard equipment: Micra K10 12 items (DX), Swift II (SF) 8 items (GA).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Nissan Micra K10
1982–1992
Suzuki Swift II (SF)
1990–2003
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Nissan Micra K10 or Suzuki Swift II (SF)?
Length: Suzuki Swift II (SF) 3,745 mm, Nissan Micra K10 3,640 mm (a 105 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,265 vs 2,300 mm.
Which uses less fuel — Nissan Micra K10 or Suzuki Swift II (SF)?
The most frugal Nissan Micra K10 uses 6.4 l/100 km (1.0); the most frugal Suzuki Swift II (SF) 5.9 l/100 km (1.0).
Which is more powerful — Nissan Micra K10 or Suzuki Swift II (SF)?
The strongest Nissan Micra K10 makes 44 kW (60 hp) (1.2 Super S); the strongest Suzuki Swift II (SF) 74 kW (101 hp) (1.3 GTi).