Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) or Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)?
2006–2012 vs 1996–2008 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Outlander II (CW) 4,665 mm, Pajero Sport I (K90) 4,610 mm — a 6 cm difference.
- Boot: Outlander II (CW) 541 l, Pajero Sport I (K90) 500 l.
- Lowest consumption: Outlander II (CW) 5.9 l/100 km, Pajero Sport I (K90) 9.2 l/100 km.
- Power: Outlander II (CW) 103–162 kW, Pajero Sport I (K90) 73–130 kW.
- Standard equipment: Outlander II (CW) 31 items (Inform), Pajero Sport I (K90) 22 items (GL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW)2006–2012 · 10 engines · Inform, Invite, Intense, InstyleSpecifications →Listings →
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)1996–2008 · 6 engines · GL, GLX, GLS, ClassicSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW)
2006–2012
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)
1996–2008
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) or Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)?
Length: Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) 4,665 mm, Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90) 4,610 mm (a 55 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,670 vs 2,725 mm. Boot: 541 vs 500 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) or Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)?
The most frugal Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) uses 5.9 l/100 km (2.3 DI-D 2WD); the most frugal Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90) 9.2 l/100 km (2.5 DI-D).
Which is more powerful — Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) or Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)?
The strongest Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) makes 162 kW (220 hp) (3.0 V6); the strongest Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90) 130 kW (177 hp) (3.0 V6).
Other comparisons
Outlander II (CW) vs Opel AntaraOutlander II (CW) vs Hyundai Santa Fe (CM)Outlander II (CW) vs Nissan X-Trail T31Outlander II (CW) vs Renault Koleos I (HY)Pajero Sport I (K90) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 90 (J90)Pajero Sport I (K90) vs Opel AntaraPajero Sport I (K90) vs Honda CR-V II (RD5)Pajero Sport I (K90) vs Mercedes-Benz G-Klasa W461Compare cars →