Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) or Mitsubishi Outlander III (GF)?
2006–2012 vs 2012–2021 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Outlander II (CW) 4,665 mm, Outlander III (GF) 4,695 mm — a 3 cm difference.
- Boot: Outlander II (CW) 541 l, Outlander III (GF) 591 l.
- Lowest consumption: Outlander II (CW) 5.9 l/100 km, Outlander III (GF) 1.8 l/100 km.
- Power: Outlander II (CW) 103–162 kW, Outlander III (GF) 110–167 kW.
- Standard equipment: Outlander II (CW) 31 items (Inform), Outlander III (GF) 36 items (Inform).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW)2006–2012 · 10 engines · Inform, Invite, Intense, InstyleSpecifications →Listings →
Mitsubishi Outlander III (GF)2012–2021 · 10 engines · Inform, Invite, Intense, InstyleSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW)
2006–2012
Mitsubishi Outlander III (GF)
2012–2021
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) or Mitsubishi Outlander III (GF)?
Length: Mitsubishi Outlander III (GF) 4,695 mm, Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) 4,665 mm (a 30 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,670 vs 2,670 mm. Boot: 591 vs 541 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) or Mitsubishi Outlander III (GF)?
The most frugal Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) uses 5.9 l/100 km (2.3 DI-D 2WD); the most frugal Mitsubishi Outlander III (GF) 1.8 l/100 km (2.0 PHEV).
Which is more powerful — Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) or Mitsubishi Outlander III (GF)?
The strongest Mitsubishi Outlander II (CW) makes 162 kW (220 hp) (3.0 V6); the strongest Mitsubishi Outlander III (GF) 167 kW (227 hp) (3.0 V6 GT).
Other comparisons
Outlander II (CW) vs Opel AntaraOutlander II (CW) vs Hyundai Santa Fe (CM)Outlander II (CW) vs Nissan X-Trail T31Outlander II (CW) vs Renault Koleos I (HY)Outlander III (GF) vs Hyundai Santa Fe (DM)Outlander III (GF) vs Škoda Kodiaq IOutlander III (GF) vs Ford Kuga Mk3Outlander III (GF) vs Honda CR-V V (RW)Compare cars →