Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Toyota Corolla E100?
1991–1996 vs 1991–1997 · Sedan/Wagon vs Hatchback 5-door/Sedan/Liftback/Hatchback 3-door/Wagon
In short
- Length: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 4,370 mm, Corolla E100 4,315 mm — a 6 cm difference.
- Boot: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 450 l, Corolla E100 470 l.
- Lowest consumption: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 5.8 l/100 km, Corolla E100 5.9 l/100 km.
- Power: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 46–103 kW, Corolla E100 53–84 kW.
- Standard equipment: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 18 items (GL), Corolla E100 11 items (XLi).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD)
1991–1996
Toyota Corolla E100
1991–1997
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Toyota Corolla E100?
Length: Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) 4,370 mm, Toyota Corolla E100 4,315 mm (a 55 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,500 vs 2,465 mm. Boot: 450 vs 470 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Toyota Corolla E100?
The most frugal Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) uses 5.8 l/100 km (1.8 D); the most frugal Toyota Corolla E100 5.9 l/100 km (2.0 D).
Which is more powerful — Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Toyota Corolla E100?
The strongest Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) makes 103 kW (140 hp) (1.8 GTi 16V); the strongest Toyota Corolla E100 84 kW (114 hp) (1.6 GLi).
Other comparisons
Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs Volkswagen Jetta III (A3 / Vento)Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs SEAT Toledo Mk1 (1L)Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs Hyundai Elantra Lantra I (J1)Corolla E100 vs Honda Civic V (EG/EH)Corolla E100 vs SEAT Toledo Mk1 (1L)Corolla E100 vs Mitsubishi Lancer V (C6/C7)Corolla E100 vs Volkswagen Jetta III (A3 / Vento)Compare cars →