Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Opel Astra F?
1991–1996 vs 1991–1998 · Sedan/Wagon vs Hatchback 5-door/Hatchback 3-door/Sedan/Wagon/Convertible
In short
- Length: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 4,370 mm, Astra F 4,290 mm — a 8 cm difference.
- Boot: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 450 l, Astra F 490 l.
- Lowest consumption: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 5.8 l/100 km, Astra F 5.6 l/100 km.
- Power: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 46–103 kW, Astra F 44–110 kW.
- Standard equipment: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 18 items (GL), Astra F 10 items (GL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD)
1991–1996
Opel Astra F
1991–1998
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Opel Astra F?
Length: Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) 4,370 mm, Opel Astra F 4,290 mm (a 80 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,500 vs 2,517 mm. Boot: 450 vs 490 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Opel Astra F?
The most frugal Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) uses 5.8 l/100 km (1.8 D); the most frugal Opel Astra F 5.6 l/100 km (1.7 TDS).
Which is more powerful — Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Opel Astra F?
The strongest Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) makes 103 kW (140 hp) (1.8 GTi 16V); the strongest Opel Astra F 110 kW (150 hp) (GSi 2.0 16V).
Other comparisons
Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs Volkswagen Jetta III (A3 / Vento)Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs SEAT Toledo Mk1 (1L)Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs Toyota Corolla E100Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs Hyundai Elantra Lantra I (J1)Astra F vs Volkswagen Golf IIIAstra F vs Škoda Octavia I (1U)Astra F vs Fiat Bravo I (Type 182)Astra F vs Peugeot 306Compare cars →