Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Mitsubishi Lancer VII (CK)?
1991–1996 vs 1995–2003 · Sedan/Wagon vs Sedan/Wagon
In short
- Length: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 4,370 mm, Lancer VII (CK) 4,430 mm — a 6 cm difference.
- Boot: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 450 l, Lancer VII (CK) 460 l.
- Lowest consumption: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 5.8 l/100 km, Lancer VII (CK) 5.9 l/100 km.
- Power: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 46–103 kW, Lancer VII (CK) 47–66 kW.
- Standard equipment: Lancer VI (CB/CD) 18 items (GL), Lancer VII (CK) 19 items (GL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD)
1991–1996
Mitsubishi Lancer VII (CK)
1995–2003
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Mitsubishi Lancer VII (CK)?
Length: Mitsubishi Lancer VII (CK) 4,430 mm, Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) 4,370 mm (a 60 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,500 vs 2,500 mm. Boot: 460 vs 450 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Mitsubishi Lancer VII (CK)?
The most frugal Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) uses 5.8 l/100 km (1.8 D); the most frugal Mitsubishi Lancer VII (CK) 5.9 l/100 km (2.0 D).
Which is more powerful — Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) or Mitsubishi Lancer VII (CK)?
The strongest Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) makes 103 kW (140 hp) (1.8 GTi 16V); the strongest Mitsubishi Lancer VII (CK) 66 kW (90 hp) (1.6 16V).
Other comparisons
Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs Volkswagen Jetta III (A3 / Vento)Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs SEAT Toledo Mk1 (1L)Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs Toyota Corolla E100Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs Hyundai Elantra Lantra I (J1)Lancer VII (CK) vs Toyota Prius XW10Lancer VII (CK) vs Volkswagen Jetta III (A3 / Vento)Lancer VII (CK) vs SEAT Toledo Mk1 (1L)Lancer VII (CK) vs Suzuki Baleno (EG)Compare cars →