Mitsubishi Lancer V (C6/C7) or Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD)?
1988–1993 vs 1991–1996 · Sedan/Hatchback 5-door vs Sedan/Wagon
In short
- Length: Lancer V (C6/C7) 4,270 mm, Lancer VI (CB/CD) 4,370 mm — a 10 cm difference.
- Boot: Lancer V (C6/C7) 400 l, Lancer VI (CB/CD) 450 l.
- Lowest consumption: Lancer V (C6/C7) 5.9 l/100 km, Lancer VI (CB/CD) 5.8 l/100 km.
- Power: Lancer V (C6/C7) 44–100 kW, Lancer VI (CB/CD) 46–103 kW.
- Standard equipment: Lancer V (C6/C7) 12 items (GL), Lancer VI (CB/CD) 18 items (GL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Mitsubishi Lancer V (C6/C7)
1988–1993
Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD)
1991–1996
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mitsubishi Lancer V (C6/C7) or Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD)?
Length: Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) 4,370 mm, Mitsubishi Lancer V (C6/C7) 4,270 mm (a 100 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,500 vs 2,455 mm. Boot: 450 vs 400 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mitsubishi Lancer V (C6/C7) or Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD)?
The most frugal Mitsubishi Lancer V (C6/C7) uses 5.9 l/100 km (1.8 D); the most frugal Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) 5.8 l/100 km (1.8 D).
Which is more powerful — Mitsubishi Lancer V (C6/C7) or Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD)?
The strongest Mitsubishi Lancer V (C6/C7) makes 100 kW (136 hp) (1.8 GTi 16V Hatchback); the strongest Mitsubishi Lancer VI (CB/CD) 103 kW (140 hp) (1.8 GTi 16V).
Other comparisons
Lancer V (C6/C7) vs Toyota Corolla E100Lancer V (C6/C7) vs Volkswagen Jetta II (A2)Lancer V (C6/C7) vs SEAT Toledo Mk1 (1L)Lancer V (C6/C7) vs Opel Astra FLancer VI (CB/CD) vs Volkswagen Jetta III (A3 / Vento)Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs SEAT Toledo Mk1 (1L)Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs Toyota Corolla E100Lancer VI (CB/CD) vs Hyundai Elantra Lantra I (J1)Compare cars →