Mitsubishi L200 IV (KB Triton) or Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)?
2006–2015 vs 2010–2022 · Pickup vs Pickup
In short
- Length: L200 IV (KB Triton) 5,185 mm, Amarok I (2H) 5,254 mm — a 7 cm difference.
- Lowest consumption: L200 IV (KB Triton) 8 l/100 km, Amarok I (2H) 7 l/100 km.
- Power: L200 IV (KB Triton) 94–131 kW, Amarok I (2H) 90–190 kW.
- Standard equipment: L200 IV (KB Triton) 26 items (Inform), Amarok I (2H) 30 items (Trendline).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Mitsubishi L200 IV (KB Triton)2006–2015 · 7 engines · Inform, Invite, Intense, Invite+Specifications →Listings →
Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)2010–2022 · 10 engines · Trendline, Highline, Aventura, StartlineSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Mitsubishi L200 IV (KB Triton)
2006–2015
Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)
2010–2022
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mitsubishi L200 IV (KB Triton) or Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)?
Length: Volkswagen Amarok I (2H) 5,254 mm, Mitsubishi L200 IV (KB Triton) 5,185 mm (a 69 mm difference). Wheelbase: 3,095 vs 3,000 mm.
Which uses less fuel — Mitsubishi L200 IV (KB Triton) or Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)?
The most frugal Mitsubishi L200 IV (KB Triton) uses 8 l/100 km (2.5 DI-D 128 2WD); the most frugal Volkswagen Amarok I (2H) 7 l/100 km (2.0 TDI 140).
Which is more powerful — Mitsubishi L200 IV (KB Triton) or Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)?
The strongest Mitsubishi L200 IV (KB Triton) makes 131 kW (178 hp) (2.5 DI-D 178 AT); the strongest Volkswagen Amarok I (2H) 190 kW (258 hp) (3.0 V6 TDI 258).
Other comparisons
L200 IV (KB Triton) vs Ford Ranger IIL200 IV (KB Triton) vs Toyota Hilux VII (AN10/AN30)L200 IV (KB Triton) vs Fiat Freemont (JC)Amarok I (2H) vs Toyota Hilux VIII (AN120)Amarok I (2H) vs Nissan Navara D40Amarok I (2H) vs Mitsubishi L200 V (KK/KL Series 5)Amarok I (2H) vs Ford Ranger III (T6)Compare cars →