Mitsubishi Colt V (CAO) or Volkswagen Polo III (6N)?
1992–1996 vs 1994–2001 · Hatchback 3-door vs Hatchback 5-door/Hatchback 3-door/Sedan/Wagon
In short
- Length: Colt V (CAO) 3,950 mm, Polo III (6N) 4,285 mm — a 34 cm difference.
- Boot: Colt V (CAO) 240 l, Polo III (6N) 455 l.
- Lowest consumption: Colt V (CAO) 6.5 l/100 km, Polo III (6N) 4.6 l/100 km.
- Power: Colt V (CAO) 55–103 kW, Polo III (6N) 37–92 kW.
- Standard equipment: Colt V (CAO) 16 items (GL), Polo III (6N) 11 items (CL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Volkswagen Polo III (6N)1994–2001 · 10 engines · CL, GL, Trendline, ComfortlineSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Mitsubishi Colt V (CAO)
1992–1996
Volkswagen Polo III (6N)
1994–2001
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mitsubishi Colt V (CAO) or Volkswagen Polo III (6N)?
Length: Volkswagen Polo III (6N) 4,285 mm, Mitsubishi Colt V (CAO) 3,950 mm (a 335 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,443 vs 2,415 mm. Boot: 455 vs 240 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mitsubishi Colt V (CAO) or Volkswagen Polo III (6N)?
The most frugal Mitsubishi Colt V (CAO) uses 6.5 l/100 km (1.3 12V); the most frugal Volkswagen Polo III (6N) 4.6 l/100 km (1.4 TDI).
Which is more powerful — Mitsubishi Colt V (CAO) or Volkswagen Polo III (6N)?
The strongest Mitsubishi Colt V (CAO) makes 103 kW (140 hp) (1.8 GTi 16V); the strongest Volkswagen Polo III (6N) 92 kW (125 hp) (1.6 GTI).