Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) or Volkswagen Polo II (86C)?
1988–1992 vs 1981–1994 · Hatchback 3-door vs Hatchback 3-door
In short
- Length: Colt III (C50) 3,950 mm, Polo II (86C) 3,725 mm — a 23 cm difference.
- Boot: Colt III (C50) 280 l, Polo II (86C) 215 l.
- Lowest consumption: Colt III (C50) 5.6 l/100 km, Polo II (86C) 5.2 l/100 km.
- Power: Colt III (C50) 44–100 kW, Polo II (86C) 33–83 kW.
- Standard equipment: Colt III (C50) 12 items (EL), Polo II (86C) 9 items (CL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Mitsubishi Colt III (C50)
1988–1992
Volkswagen Polo II (86C)
1981–1994
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) or Volkswagen Polo II (86C)?
Length: Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) 3,950 mm, Volkswagen Polo II (86C) 3,725 mm (a 225 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,385 vs 2,335 mm. Boot: 280 vs 215 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) or Volkswagen Polo II (86C)?
The most frugal Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) uses 5.6 l/100 km (1.8 D); the most frugal Volkswagen Polo II (86C) 5.2 l/100 km (1.4 D).
Which is more powerful — Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) or Volkswagen Polo II (86C)?
The strongest Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) makes 100 kW (136 hp) (1.8 GTi 16V); the strongest Volkswagen Polo II (86C) 83 kW (113 hp) (1.3 G40).