Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) or Volkswagen Golf II?
1988–1992 vs 1983–1991 · Hatchback 3-door vs Hatchback 3-door/Hatchback 5-door
In short
- Length: Colt III (C50) 3,950 mm, Golf II 3,985 mm — a 4 cm difference.
- Boot: Colt III (C50) 280 l, Golf II 340 l.
- Lowest consumption: Colt III (C50) 5.6 l/100 km, Golf II 5.7 l/100 km.
- Power: Colt III (C50) 44–100 kW, Golf II 40–118 kW.
- Standard equipment: Colt III (C50) 12 items (EL), Golf II 12 items (C).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Mitsubishi Colt III (C50)
1988–1992
Volkswagen Golf II
1983–1991
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) or Volkswagen Golf II?
Length: Volkswagen Golf II 3,985 mm, Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) 3,950 mm (a 35 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,475 vs 2,385 mm. Boot: 340 vs 280 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) or Volkswagen Golf II?
The most frugal Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) uses 5.6 l/100 km (1.8 D); the most frugal Volkswagen Golf II 5.7 l/100 km (1.6 D).
Which is more powerful — Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) or Volkswagen Golf II?
The strongest Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) makes 100 kW (136 hp) (1.8 GTi 16V); the strongest Volkswagen Golf II 118 kW (160 hp) (1.8 G60).