Mercedes-Benz GLS X164 (GL) or Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)?
2006–2012 vs 2010–2022 · SUV 5-door vs Pickup
In short
- Length: GLS X164 (GL) 5,088 mm, Amarok I (2H) 5,254 mm — a 17 cm difference.
- Lowest consumption: GLS X164 (GL) 8.9 l/100 km, Amarok I (2H) 7 l/100 km.
- Power: GLS X164 (GL) 155–285 kW, Amarok I (2H) 90–190 kW.
- Standard equipment: GLS X164 (GL) 27 items (Standard), Amarok I (2H) 30 items (Trendline).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Mercedes-Benz GLS X164 (GL)2006–2012 · 6 engines · Standard, AMG Sports Package, Off-Road Package, Grand EditionSpecifications →Listings →
Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)2010–2022 · 10 engines · Trendline, Highline, Aventura, StartlineSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Mercedes-Benz GLS X164 (GL)
2006–2012
Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)
2010–2022
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mercedes-Benz GLS X164 (GL) or Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)?
Length: Volkswagen Amarok I (2H) 5,254 mm, Mercedes-Benz GLS X164 (GL) 5,088 mm (a 166 mm difference). Wheelbase: 3,095 vs 3,075 mm.
Which uses less fuel — Mercedes-Benz GLS X164 (GL) or Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)?
The most frugal Mercedes-Benz GLS X164 (GL) uses 8.9 l/100 km (GL 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY); the most frugal Volkswagen Amarok I (2H) 7 l/100 km (2.0 TDI 140).
Which is more powerful — Mercedes-Benz GLS X164 (GL) or Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)?
The strongest Mercedes-Benz GLS X164 (GL) makes 285 kW (387 hp) (GL 500 4MATIC); the strongest Volkswagen Amarok I (2H) 190 kW (258 hp) (3.0 V6 TDI 258).
Other comparisons
GLS X164 (GL) vs Audi Q7 (4L)GLS X164 (GL) vs Ford Explorer IV (U251)GLS X164 (GL) vs Nissan Patrol Y62GLS X164 (GL) vs BMW X5 E70Amarok I (2H) vs Toyota Hilux VIII (AN120)Amarok I (2H) vs Nissan Navara D40Amarok I (2H) vs Mitsubishi L200 V (KK/KL Series 5)Amarok I (2H) vs Ford Ranger III (T6)Compare cars →