Mazda 323 BG or Mitsubishi Colt III (C50)?
1989–1994 vs 1988–1992 · Hatchback 5-door/Sedan/Hatchback 3-door/Liftback vs Hatchback 3-door
In short
- Length: 323 BG 4,260 mm, Colt III (C50) 3,950 mm — a 31 cm difference.
- Boot: 323 BG 440 l, Colt III (C50) 280 l.
- Lowest consumption: 323 BG 5.6 l/100 km, Colt III (C50) 5.6 l/100 km.
- Power: 323 BG 42–136 kW, Colt III (C50) 44–100 kW.
- Standard equipment: 323 BG 10 items (LX), Colt III (C50) 12 items (EL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Mazda 323 BG
1989–1994
Mitsubishi Colt III (C50)
1988–1992
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mazda 323 BG or Mitsubishi Colt III (C50)?
Length: Mazda 323 BG 4,260 mm, Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) 3,950 mm (a 310 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,500 vs 2,385 mm. Boot: 440 vs 280 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mazda 323 BG or Mitsubishi Colt III (C50)?
The most frugal Mazda 323 BG uses 5.6 l/100 km (1.7 D 57); the most frugal Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) 5.6 l/100 km (1.8 D).
Which is more powerful — Mazda 323 BG or Mitsubishi Colt III (C50)?
The strongest Mazda 323 BG makes 136 kW (185 hp) (1.8 16V Turbo GT-R); the strongest Mitsubishi Colt III (C50) 100 kW (136 hp) (1.8 GTi 16V).