Mazda 323 BF or Volkswagen Golf II?
1985–1989 vs 1983–1991 · Hatchback 3-door/Hatchback 5-door/Sedan/Wagon vs Hatchback 3-door/Hatchback 5-door
In short
- Length: 323 BF 4,230 mm, Golf II 3,985 mm — a 25 cm difference.
- Boot: 323 BF 400 l, Golf II 340 l.
- Lowest consumption: 323 BF 5.5 l/100 km, Golf II 5.7 l/100 km.
- Power: 323 BF 42–110 kW, Golf II 40–118 kW.
- Standard equipment: 323 BF 12 items (LX), Golf II 12 items (C).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Mazda 323 BF
1985–1989
Volkswagen Golf II
1983–1991
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mazda 323 BF or Volkswagen Golf II?
Length: Mazda 323 BF 4,230 mm, Volkswagen Golf II 3,985 mm (a 245 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,400 vs 2,475 mm. Boot: 400 vs 340 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mazda 323 BF or Volkswagen Golf II?
The most frugal Mazda 323 BF uses 5.5 l/100 km (1.7 D); the most frugal Volkswagen Golf II 5.7 l/100 km (1.6 D).
Which is more powerful — Mazda 323 BF or Volkswagen Golf II?
The strongest Mazda 323 BF makes 110 kW (150 hp) (1.6i 16V Turbo 4WD); the strongest Volkswagen Golf II 118 kW (160 hp) (1.8 G60).