Mazda 323 BF or Volkswagen Beetle Type 1 (Kafer)?
1985–1989 vs 1946–2003 · Hatchback 3-door/Hatchback 5-door/Sedan/Wagon vs Sedan/Convertible
In short
- Length: 323 BF 4,230 mm, Beetle Type 1 (Kafer) 4,110 mm — a 12 cm difference.
- Boot: 323 BF 400 l, Beetle Type 1 (Kafer) 260 l.
- Lowest consumption: 323 BF 5.5 l/100 km, Beetle Type 1 (Kafer) 8.4 l/100 km.
- Power: 323 BF 42–110 kW, Beetle Type 1 (Kafer) 33–37 kW.
- Standard equipment: 323 BF 12 items (LX), Beetle Type 1 (Kafer) 12 items (Standard).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Volkswagen Beetle Type 1 (Kafer)1946–2003 · 5 engines · Standard, Export, L, LSSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Mazda 323 BF
1985–1989
Volkswagen Beetle Type 1 (Kafer)
1946–2003
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mazda 323 BF or Volkswagen Beetle Type 1 (Kafer)?
Length: Mazda 323 BF 4,230 mm, Volkswagen Beetle Type 1 (Kafer) 4,110 mm (a 120 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,400 vs 2,420 mm. Boot: 400 vs 260 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mazda 323 BF or Volkswagen Beetle Type 1 (Kafer)?
The most frugal Mazda 323 BF uses 5.5 l/100 km (1.7 D); the most frugal Volkswagen Beetle Type 1 (Kafer) 8.4 l/100 km (1.6i).
Which is more powerful — Mazda 323 BF or Volkswagen Beetle Type 1 (Kafer)?
The strongest Mazda 323 BF makes 110 kW (150 hp) (1.6i 16V Turbo 4WD); the strongest Volkswagen Beetle Type 1 (Kafer) 37 kW (50 hp) (1.6).