Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Toyota Corolla E100?
1994–1998 vs 1991–1997 · Liftback/Sedan/Hatchback 3-door vs Hatchback 5-door/Sedan/Liftback/Hatchback 3-door/Wagon
In short
- Length: 323 BA (323F) 4,340 mm, Corolla E100 4,315 mm — a 3 cm difference.
- Boot: 323 BA (323F) 427 l, Corolla E100 470 l.
- Lowest consumption: 323 BA (323F) 5.9 l/100 km, Corolla E100 5.9 l/100 km.
- Power: 323 BA (323F) 52–106 kW, Corolla E100 53–84 kW.
- Standard equipment: 323 BA (323F) 14 items (LX), Corolla E100 11 items (XLi).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Mazda 323 BA (323F)
1994–1998
Toyota Corolla E100
1991–1997
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Toyota Corolla E100?
Length: Mazda 323 BA (323F) 4,340 mm, Toyota Corolla E100 4,315 mm (a 25 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,605 vs 2,465 mm. Boot: 427 vs 470 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Toyota Corolla E100?
The most frugal Mazda 323 BA (323F) uses 5.9 l/100 km (2.0 D 71); the most frugal Toyota Corolla E100 5.9 l/100 km (2.0 D).
Which is more powerful — Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Toyota Corolla E100?
The strongest Mazda 323 BA (323F) makes 106 kW (144 hp) (2.0 V6); the strongest Toyota Corolla E100 84 kW (114 hp) (1.6 GLi).