Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Opel Astra F?
1994–1998 vs 1991–1998 · Liftback/Sedan/Hatchback 3-door vs Hatchback 5-door/Hatchback 3-door/Sedan/Wagon/Convertible
In short
- Length: 323 BA (323F) 4,340 mm, Astra F 4,290 mm — a 5 cm difference.
- Boot: 323 BA (323F) 427 l, Astra F 490 l.
- Lowest consumption: 323 BA (323F) 5.9 l/100 km, Astra F 5.6 l/100 km.
- Power: 323 BA (323F) 52–106 kW, Astra F 44–110 kW.
- Standard equipment: 323 BA (323F) 14 items (LX), Astra F 10 items (GL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Mazda 323 BA (323F)
1994–1998
Opel Astra F
1991–1998
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Opel Astra F?
Length: Mazda 323 BA (323F) 4,340 mm, Opel Astra F 4,290 mm (a 50 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,605 vs 2,517 mm. Boot: 427 vs 490 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Opel Astra F?
The most frugal Mazda 323 BA (323F) uses 5.9 l/100 km (2.0 D 71); the most frugal Opel Astra F 5.6 l/100 km (1.7 TDS).
Which is more powerful — Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Opel Astra F?
The strongest Mazda 323 BA (323F) makes 106 kW (144 hp) (2.0 V6); the strongest Opel Astra F 110 kW (150 hp) (GSi 2.0 16V).