Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Mazda 323 BG?
1994–1998 vs 1989–1994 · Liftback/Sedan/Hatchback 3-door vs Hatchback 5-door/Sedan/Hatchback 3-door/Liftback
In short
- Length: 323 BA (323F) 4,340 mm, 323 BG 4,260 mm — a 8 cm difference.
- Boot: 323 BA (323F) 427 l, 323 BG 440 l.
- Lowest consumption: 323 BA (323F) 5.9 l/100 km, 323 BG 5.6 l/100 km.
- Power: 323 BA (323F) 52–106 kW, 323 BG 42–136 kW.
- Standard equipment: 323 BA (323F) 14 items (LX), 323 BG 10 items (LX).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Mazda 323 BA (323F)
1994–1998
Mazda 323 BG
1989–1994
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Mazda 323 BG?
Length: Mazda 323 BA (323F) 4,340 mm, Mazda 323 BG 4,260 mm (a 80 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,605 vs 2,500 mm. Boot: 427 vs 440 l.
Which uses less fuel — Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Mazda 323 BG?
The most frugal Mazda 323 BA (323F) uses 5.9 l/100 km (2.0 D 71); the most frugal Mazda 323 BG 5.6 l/100 km (1.7 D 57).
Which is more powerful — Mazda 323 BA (323F) or Mazda 323 BG?
The strongest Mazda 323 BA (323F) makes 106 kW (144 hp) (2.0 V6); the strongest Mazda 323 BG 136 kW (185 hp) (1.8 16V Turbo GT-R).