Land Rover Range Rover P38A or Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)?
1994–2002 vs 1996–2008 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Range Rover P38A 4,713 mm, Pajero Sport I (K90) 4,610 mm — a 10 cm difference.
- Boot: Range Rover P38A 630 l, Pajero Sport I (K90) 500 l.
- Lowest consumption: Range Rover P38A 11.5 l/100 km, Pajero Sport I (K90) 9.2 l/100 km.
- Power: Range Rover P38A 100–165 kW, Pajero Sport I (K90) 73–130 kW.
- Standard equipment: Range Rover P38A 22 items (Base), Pajero Sport I (K90) 22 items (GL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)1996–2008 · 6 engines · GL, GLX, GLS, ClassicSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Land Rover Range Rover P38A
1994–2002
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)
1996–2008
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Land Rover Range Rover P38A or Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)?
Length: Land Rover Range Rover P38A 4,713 mm, Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90) 4,610 mm (a 103 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,745 vs 2,725 mm. Boot: 630 vs 500 l.
Which uses less fuel — Land Rover Range Rover P38A or Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)?
The most frugal Land Rover Range Rover P38A uses 11.5 l/100 km (2.5 DSE); the most frugal Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90) 9.2 l/100 km (2.5 DI-D).
Which is more powerful — Land Rover Range Rover P38A or Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)?
The strongest Land Rover Range Rover P38A makes 165 kW (224 hp) (4.6 V8 HSE); the strongest Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90) 130 kW (177 hp) (3.0 V6).
Other comparisons
Range Rover P38A vs Ford Explorer II (UN105)Range Rover P38A vs Jeep Grand Cherokee WJRange Rover P38A vs Toyota Land Cruiser 80 (J80)Range Rover P38A vs Nissan Pathfinder R50Pajero Sport I (K90) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 90 (J90)Pajero Sport I (K90) vs Opel AntaraPajero Sport I (K90) vs Honda CR-V II (RD5)Pajero Sport I (K90) vs Mercedes-Benz G-Klasa W461Compare cars →