Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Nissan Terrano II R20?
1970–1996 vs 1993–2006 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 5-door/SUV 3-door
In short
- Length: Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm, Terrano II R20 4,715 mm — a 5 cm difference.
- Boot: Range Rover Classic 800 l, Terrano II R20 480 l.
- Lowest consumption: Range Rover Classic 10.8 l/100 km, Terrano II R20 9.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Range Rover Classic 83–149 kW, Terrano II R20 74–113 kW.
- Standard equipment: Range Rover Classic 12 items (Base), Terrano II R20 16 items (S).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Land Rover Range Rover Classic
1970–1996
Nissan Terrano II R20
1993–2006
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Nissan Terrano II R20?
Length: Nissan Terrano II R20 4,715 mm, Land Rover Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm (a 45 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,650 vs 2,743 mm. Boot: 480 vs 800 l.
Which uses less fuel — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Nissan Terrano II R20?
The most frugal Land Rover Range Rover Classic uses 10.8 l/100 km (2.5 200 Tdi); the most frugal Nissan Terrano II R20 9.5 l/100 km (2.7 TDi).
Which is more powerful — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Nissan Terrano II R20?
The strongest Land Rover Range Rover Classic makes 149 kW (203 hp) (4.2 V8 LSE); the strongest Nissan Terrano II R20 113 kW (154 hp) (3.0 Di).
Other comparisons
Range Rover Classic vs Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)Range Rover Classic vs Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJRange Rover Classic vs Land Rover Discovery Series ITerrano II R20 vs Land Rover Freelander (L314)Terrano II R20 vs Honda CR-V I (RD1)Terrano II R20 vs Hyundai Santa Fe (SM)Terrano II R20 vs Land Rover Discovery Series ICompare cars →