Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Nissan Pathfinder WD21?
1970–1996 vs 1986–1995 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 3-door/SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm, Pathfinder WD21 4,365 mm — a 31 cm difference.
- Lowest consumption: Range Rover Classic 10.8 l/100 km, Pathfinder WD21 12.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Range Rover Classic 83–149 kW, Pathfinder WD21 78–113 kW.
- Standard equipment: Range Rover Classic 12 items (Base), Pathfinder WD21 12 items (E).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Land Rover Range Rover Classic
1970–1996
Nissan Pathfinder WD21
1986–1995
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Nissan Pathfinder WD21?
Length: Land Rover Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm, Nissan Pathfinder WD21 4,365 mm (a 305 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,743 vs 2,650 mm.
Which uses less fuel — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Nissan Pathfinder WD21?
The most frugal Land Rover Range Rover Classic uses 10.8 l/100 km (2.5 200 Tdi); the most frugal Nissan Pathfinder WD21 12.5 l/100 km (2.4).
Which is more powerful — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Nissan Pathfinder WD21?
The strongest Land Rover Range Rover Classic makes 149 kW (203 hp) (4.2 V8 LSE); the strongest Nissan Pathfinder WD21 113 kW (154 hp) (3.0 V6).
Other comparisons
Range Rover Classic vs Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)Range Rover Classic vs Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJRange Rover Classic vs Land Rover Discovery Series IRange Rover Classic vs Nissan Terrano II R20Pathfinder WD21 vs Mercedes-Benz G-Klasa W460Pathfinder WD21 vs Nissan Terrano WD21Pathfinder WD21 vs Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)Pathfinder WD21 vs Jeep Cherokee XJCompare cars →