Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)?
1970–1996 vs 1991–1999 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 5-door/SUV 3-door
In short
- Length: Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm, Pajero II (V20) 4,705 mm — a 4 cm difference.
- Boot: Range Rover Classic 800 l, Pajero II (V20) 400 l.
- Lowest consumption: Range Rover Classic 10.8 l/100 km, Pajero II (V20) 10 l/100 km.
- Power: Range Rover Classic 83–149 kW, Pajero II (V20) 73–153 kW.
- Standard equipment: Range Rover Classic 12 items (Base), Pajero II (V20) 23 items (GL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Land Rover Range Rover Classic
1970–1996
Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)
1991–1999
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)?
Length: Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20) 4,705 mm, Land Rover Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm (a 35 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,725 vs 2,743 mm. Boot: 400 vs 800 l.
Which uses less fuel — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)?
The most frugal Land Rover Range Rover Classic uses 10.8 l/100 km (2.5 200 Tdi); the most frugal Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20) 10 l/100 km (2.5 TD 3D).
Which is more powerful — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)?
The strongest Land Rover Range Rover Classic makes 149 kW (203 hp) (4.2 V8 LSE); the strongest Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20) 153 kW (208 hp) (3.5 V6).
Other comparisons
Range Rover Classic vs Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJRange Rover Classic vs Land Rover Discovery Series IRange Rover Classic vs Nissan Terrano II R20Pajero II (V20) vs Honda CR-V I (RD1)Pajero II (V20) vs Land Rover Discovery Series IPajero II (V20) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 90 (J90)Pajero II (V20) vs Nissan Terrano II R20Compare cars →