Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040)?
1970–1996 vs 1982–1991 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 3-door/SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm, Pajero I (L040) 4,650 mm — a 2 cm difference.
- Lowest consumption: Range Rover Classic 10.8 l/100 km, Pajero I (L040) 10.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Range Rover Classic 83–149 kW, Pajero I (L040) 62–104 kW.
- Standard equipment: Range Rover Classic 12 items (Base), Pajero I (L040) 13 items (Standard).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Land Rover Range Rover Classic
1970–1996
Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040)
1982–1991
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040)?
Length: Land Rover Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm, Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040) 4,650 mm (a 20 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,743 vs 2,695 mm.
Which uses less fuel — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040)?
The most frugal Land Rover Range Rover Classic uses 10.8 l/100 km (2.5 200 Tdi); the most frugal Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040) 10.5 l/100 km (2.5 TD).
Which is more powerful — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040)?
The strongest Land Rover Range Rover Classic makes 149 kW (203 hp) (4.2 V8 LSE); the strongest Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040) 104 kW (141 hp) (3.0 V6).
Other comparisons
Range Rover Classic vs Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)Range Rover Classic vs Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJRange Rover Classic vs Land Rover Discovery Series IRange Rover Classic vs Nissan Terrano II R20Pajero I (L040) vs Mercedes-Benz G-Klasa W460Pajero I (L040) vs Land Rover Discovery Series IPajero I (L040) vs Nissan Pathfinder WD21Pajero I (L040) vs Jeep Cherokee XJCompare cars →