Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Land Rover Range Rover P38A?
1970–1996 vs 1994–2002 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm, Range Rover P38A 4,713 mm — a 4 cm difference.
- Boot: Range Rover Classic 800 l, Range Rover P38A 630 l.
- Lowest consumption: Range Rover Classic 10.8 l/100 km, Range Rover P38A 11.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Range Rover Classic 83–149 kW, Range Rover P38A 100–165 kW.
- Standard equipment: Range Rover Classic 12 items (Base), Range Rover P38A 22 items (Base).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Land Rover Range Rover Classic
1970–1996
Land Rover Range Rover P38A
1994–2002
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Land Rover Range Rover P38A?
Length: Land Rover Range Rover P38A 4,713 mm, Land Rover Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm (a 43 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,745 vs 2,743 mm. Boot: 630 vs 800 l.
Which uses less fuel — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Land Rover Range Rover P38A?
The most frugal Land Rover Range Rover Classic uses 10.8 l/100 km (2.5 200 Tdi); the most frugal Land Rover Range Rover P38A 11.5 l/100 km (2.5 DSE).
Which is more powerful — Land Rover Range Rover Classic or Land Rover Range Rover P38A?
The strongest Land Rover Range Rover Classic makes 149 kW (203 hp) (4.2 V8 LSE); the strongest Land Rover Range Rover P38A 165 kW (224 hp) (4.6 V8 HSE).
Other comparisons
Range Rover Classic vs Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)Range Rover Classic vs Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJRange Rover Classic vs Land Rover Discovery Series IRange Rover Classic vs Nissan Terrano II R20Range Rover P38A vs Ford Explorer II (UN105)Range Rover P38A vs Jeep Grand Cherokee WJRange Rover P38A vs Toyota Land Cruiser 80 (J80)Range Rover P38A vs Nissan Pathfinder R50Compare cars →