Land Rover Freelander (L314) or Land Rover Freelander 2 (L359)?
1997–2006 vs 2006–2014 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Freelander (L314) 4,438 mm, Freelander 2 (L359) 4,500 mm — a 6 cm difference.
- Lowest consumption: Freelander (L314) 7.9 l/100 km, Freelander 2 (L359) 5.7 l/100 km.
- Power: Freelander (L314) 72–130 kW, Freelander 2 (L359) 110–171 kW.
- Standard equipment: Freelander (L314) 20 items (S), Freelander 2 (L359) 29 items (S).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Land Rover Freelander (L314)
1997–2006
Land Rover Freelander 2 (L359)
2006–2014
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Land Rover Freelander (L314) or Land Rover Freelander 2 (L359)?
Length: Land Rover Freelander 2 (L359) 4,500 mm, Land Rover Freelander (L314) 4,438 mm (a 62 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,660 vs 2,557 mm. Boot: 755 vs 755 l.
Which uses less fuel — Land Rover Freelander (L314) or Land Rover Freelander 2 (L359)?
The most frugal Land Rover Freelander (L314) uses 7.9 l/100 km (2.0 Td4); the most frugal Land Rover Freelander 2 (L359) 5.7 l/100 km (2.2 eD4).
Which is more powerful — Land Rover Freelander (L314) or Land Rover Freelander 2 (L359)?
The strongest Land Rover Freelander (L314) makes 130 kW (177 hp) (2.5 V6); the strongest Land Rover Freelander 2 (L359) 171 kW (232 hp) (3.2 i6).
Other comparisons
Freelander (L314) vs Nissan Terrano II R20Freelander (L314) vs Honda CR-V I (RD1)Freelander (L314) vs Hyundai Santa Fe (SM)Freelander (L314) vs Nissan X-Trail T30Freelander 2 (L359) vs Jeep Cherokee KKFreelander 2 (L359) vs BMW X1 E84Freelander 2 (L359) vs Renault Koleos I (HY)Freelander 2 (L359) vs Opel AntaraCompare cars →