Land Rover Defender (classic) or Nissan Pathfinder WD21?
1990–2016 vs 1986–1995 · SUV 5-door/SUV 3-door vs SUV 3-door/SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Defender (classic) 4,599 mm, Pathfinder WD21 4,365 mm — a 23 cm difference.
- Lowest consumption: Defender (classic) 10.5 l/100 km, Pathfinder WD21 12.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Defender (classic) 83–90 kW, Pathfinder WD21 78–113 kW.
- Standard equipment: Defender (classic) 17 items (Base / Hard Top), Pathfinder WD21 12 items (E).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Land Rover Defender (classic)1990–2016 · 4 engines · Base / Hard Top, County Station Wagon, XS, AdventureSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Land Rover Defender (classic)
1990–2016
Nissan Pathfinder WD21
1986–1995
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Land Rover Defender (classic) or Nissan Pathfinder WD21?
Length: Land Rover Defender (classic) 4,599 mm, Nissan Pathfinder WD21 4,365 mm (a 234 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,794 vs 2,650 mm.
Which uses less fuel — Land Rover Defender (classic) or Nissan Pathfinder WD21?
The most frugal Land Rover Defender (classic) uses 10.5 l/100 km (2.5 300 Tdi); the most frugal Nissan Pathfinder WD21 12.5 l/100 km (2.4).
Which is more powerful — Land Rover Defender (classic) or Nissan Pathfinder WD21?
The strongest Land Rover Defender (classic) makes 90 kW (122 hp) (2.5 Td5); the strongest Nissan Pathfinder WD21 113 kW (154 hp) (3.0 V6).
Other comparisons
Defender (classic) vs Nissan Terrano WD21Defender (classic) vs Dacia Duster IDefender (classic) vs Land Rover Freelander (L314)Defender (classic) vs Honda CR-V I (RD1)Pathfinder WD21 vs Mercedes-Benz G-Klasa W460Pathfinder WD21 vs Nissan Terrano WD21Pathfinder WD21 vs Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)Pathfinder WD21 vs Jeep Cherokee XJCompare cars →