Kia Optima II / Magentis (MG) or Kia Optima TF?
2005–2010 vs 2010–2015 · Sedan vs Sedan
In short
- Length: Optima II / Magentis (MG) 4,735 mm, Optima TF 4,845 mm — a 11 cm difference.
- Boot: Optima II / Magentis (MG) 420 l, Optima TF 505 l.
- Lowest consumption: Optima II / Magentis (MG) 6 l/100 km, Optima TF 5 l/100 km.
- Power: Optima II / Magentis (MG) 103–142 kW, Optima TF 100–202 kW.
- Standard equipment: Optima II / Magentis (MG) 21 items (LX), Optima TF 29 items (LX).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Kia Optima II / Magentis (MG)
2005–2010
Kia Optima TF
2010–2015
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Kia Optima II / Magentis (MG) or Kia Optima TF?
Length: Kia Optima TF 4,845 mm, Kia Optima II / Magentis (MG) 4,735 mm (a 110 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,795 vs 2,720 mm. Boot: 505 vs 420 l.
Which uses less fuel — Kia Optima II / Magentis (MG) or Kia Optima TF?
The most frugal Kia Optima II / Magentis (MG) uses 6 l/100 km (2.0 CRDi); the most frugal Kia Optima TF 5 l/100 km (1.7 CRDi 136).
Which is more powerful — Kia Optima II / Magentis (MG) or Kia Optima TF?
The strongest Kia Optima II / Magentis (MG) makes 142 kW (193 hp) (2.7 V6 193); the strongest Kia Optima TF 202 kW (275 hp) (2.0 T-GDI).
Other comparisons
Optima II / Magentis (MG) vs Renault Laguna IIIOptima II / Magentis (MG) vs Honda Accord VIII (CU/CW)Optima II / Magentis (MG) vs Peugeot 407Optima II / Magentis (MG) vs Volkswagen Passat B6Optima TF vs Toyota Camry XV50Optima TF vs Mazda 6 GJ/GLOptima TF vs Opel Insignia AOptima TF vs Škoda Superb II (3T)Compare cars →