Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ or Nissan Pathfinder R50?
1993–1998 vs 1996–2004 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Grand Cherokee ZJ 4,590 mm, Pathfinder R50 4,740 mm — a 15 cm difference.
- Boot: Grand Cherokee ZJ 1,130 l, Pathfinder R50 480 l.
- Lowest consumption: Grand Cherokee ZJ 9.8 l/100 km, Pathfinder R50 12.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Grand Cherokee ZJ 85–162 kW, Pathfinder R50 110–177 kW.
- Standard equipment: Grand Cherokee ZJ 24 items (Laredo), Pathfinder R50 19 items (XE).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ
1993–1998
Nissan Pathfinder R50
1996–2004
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ or Nissan Pathfinder R50?
Length: Nissan Pathfinder R50 4,740 mm, Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ 4,590 mm (a 150 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,700 vs 2,692 mm. Boot: 480 vs 1,130 l.
Which uses less fuel — Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ or Nissan Pathfinder R50?
The most frugal Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ uses 9.8 l/100 km (2.5 TD); the most frugal Nissan Pathfinder R50 12.5 l/100 km (3.5 V6).
Which is more powerful — Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ or Nissan Pathfinder R50?
The strongest Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ makes 162 kW (220 hp) (5.2 V8); the strongest Nissan Pathfinder R50 177 kW (241 hp) (3.5 V6).
Other comparisons
Grand Cherokee ZJ vs Toyota Land Cruiser 90 (J90)Grand Cherokee ZJ vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)Grand Cherokee ZJ vs Land Rover Range Rover ClassicPathfinder R50 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee WJPathfinder R50 vs Ford Explorer II (UN105)Pathfinder R50 vs Kia Sorento BLPathfinder R50 vs Lexus RX XU10Compare cars →