Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ or Land Rover Range Rover Classic?
1993–1998 vs 1970–1996 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Grand Cherokee ZJ 4,590 mm, Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm — a 8 cm difference.
- Boot: Grand Cherokee ZJ 1,130 l, Range Rover Classic 800 l.
- Lowest consumption: Grand Cherokee ZJ 9.8 l/100 km, Range Rover Classic 10.8 l/100 km.
- Power: Grand Cherokee ZJ 85–162 kW, Range Rover Classic 83–149 kW.
- Standard equipment: Grand Cherokee ZJ 24 items (Laredo), Range Rover Classic 12 items (Base).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ
1993–1998
Land Rover Range Rover Classic
1970–1996
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ or Land Rover Range Rover Classic?
Length: Land Rover Range Rover Classic 4,670 mm, Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ 4,590 mm (a 80 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,743 vs 2,692 mm. Boot: 800 vs 1,130 l.
Which uses less fuel — Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ or Land Rover Range Rover Classic?
The most frugal Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ uses 9.8 l/100 km (2.5 TD); the most frugal Land Rover Range Rover Classic 10.8 l/100 km (2.5 200 Tdi).
Which is more powerful — Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ or Land Rover Range Rover Classic?
The strongest Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ makes 162 kW (220 hp) (5.2 V8); the strongest Land Rover Range Rover Classic 149 kW (203 hp) (4.2 V8 LSE).
Other comparisons
Grand Cherokee ZJ vs Toyota Land Cruiser 90 (J90)Grand Cherokee ZJ vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I (K90)Grand Cherokee ZJ vs Nissan Pathfinder R50Range Rover Classic vs Mitsubishi Pajero II (V20)Range Rover Classic vs Land Rover Discovery Series IRange Rover Classic vs Nissan Terrano II R20Compare cars →