Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ or Land Rover Range Rover P38A?
1999–2004 vs 1994–2002 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Grand Cherokee WJ 4,630 mm, Range Rover P38A 4,713 mm — a 8 cm difference.
- Boot: Grand Cherokee WJ 1,113 l, Range Rover P38A 630 l.
- Lowest consumption: Grand Cherokee WJ 9.4 l/100 km, Range Rover P38A 11.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Grand Cherokee WJ 103–165 kW, Range Rover P38A 100–165 kW.
- Standard equipment: Grand Cherokee WJ 26 items (Laredo), Range Rover P38A 22 items (Base).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ
1999–2004
Land Rover Range Rover P38A
1994–2002
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ or Land Rover Range Rover P38A?
Length: Land Rover Range Rover P38A 4,713 mm, Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ 4,630 mm (a 83 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,745 vs 2,690 mm. Boot: 630 vs 1,113 l.
Which uses less fuel — Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ or Land Rover Range Rover P38A?
The most frugal Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ uses 9.4 l/100 km (2.7 CRD); the most frugal Land Rover Range Rover P38A 11.5 l/100 km (2.5 DSE).
Which is more powerful — Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ or Land Rover Range Rover P38A?
The strongest Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ makes 165 kW (224 hp) (4.7 V8); the strongest Land Rover Range Rover P38A 165 kW (224 hp) (4.6 V8 HSE).
Other comparisons
Grand Cherokee WJ vs Kia Sorento BLGrand Cherokee WJ vs Nissan Pathfinder R50Grand Cherokee WJ vs Mitsubishi Pajero III (V60)Grand Cherokee WJ vs Toyota Land Cruiser 120 (J120)Range Rover P38A vs Ford Explorer II (UN105)Range Rover P38A vs Toyota Land Cruiser 80 (J80)Range Rover P38A vs Nissan Pathfinder R50Compare cars →