Jeep Cherokee XJ or Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040)?
1984–2001 vs 1982–1991 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 3-door/SUV 5-door
In short
- Length: Cherokee XJ 4,241 mm, Pajero I (L040) 4,650 mm — a 41 cm difference.
- Lowest consumption: Cherokee XJ 9.5 l/100 km, Pajero I (L040) 10.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Cherokee XJ 85–135 kW, Pajero I (L040) 62–104 kW.
- Standard equipment: Cherokee XJ 19 items (Sport), Pajero I (L040) 13 items (Standard).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Jeep Cherokee XJ
1984–2001
Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040)
1982–1991
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Jeep Cherokee XJ or Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040)?
Length: Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040) 4,650 mm, Jeep Cherokee XJ 4,241 mm (a 409 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,695 vs 2,578 mm.
Which uses less fuel — Jeep Cherokee XJ or Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040)?
The most frugal Jeep Cherokee XJ uses 9.5 l/100 km (2.5 TD); the most frugal Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040) 10.5 l/100 km (2.5 TD).
Which is more powerful — Jeep Cherokee XJ or Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040)?
The strongest Jeep Cherokee XJ makes 135 kW (184 hp) (4.0 i); the strongest Mitsubishi Pajero I (L040) 104 kW (141 hp) (3.0 V6).
Other comparisons
Cherokee XJ vs Kia Sportage I (JA/NB)Cherokee XJ vs Nissan Pathfinder WD21Cherokee XJ vs Land Rover Freelander (L314)Cherokee XJ vs Nissan Terrano II R20Pajero I (L040) vs Mercedes-Benz G-Klasa W460Pajero I (L040) vs Land Rover Discovery Series IPajero I (L040) vs Nissan Pathfinder WD21Compare cars →