Hyundai i10 (AC3) or Mitsubishi Space Star II (A00)?
2019–present vs 2012–present · Hatchback 5-door vs Hatchback 5-door
In short
- Length: i10 (AC3) 3,675 mm, Space Star II (A00) 3,845 mm — a 17 cm difference.
- Boot: i10 (AC3) 252 l, Space Star II (A00) 235 l.
- Lowest consumption: i10 (AC3) 4.9 l/100 km, Space Star II (A00) 4.3 l/100 km.
- Power: i10 (AC3) 46–74 kW, Space Star II (A00) 52–59 kW.
- Standard equipment: i10 (AC3) 23 items (Pure), Space Star II (A00) 30 items (Inform).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Mitsubishi Space Star II (A00)2012–present · 5 engines · Inform, Invite, Intense, BasisSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Hyundai i10 (AC3)
2019–present
Mitsubishi Space Star II (A00)
2012–present
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Hyundai i10 (AC3) or Mitsubishi Space Star II (A00)?
Length: Mitsubishi Space Star II (A00) 3,845 mm, Hyundai i10 (AC3) 3,675 mm (a 170 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,450 vs 2,425 mm. Boot: 235 vs 252 l.
Which uses less fuel — Hyundai i10 (AC3) or Mitsubishi Space Star II (A00)?
The most frugal Hyundai i10 (AC3) uses 4.9 l/100 km (1.0 MPI); the most frugal Mitsubishi Space Star II (A00) 4.3 l/100 km (1.0 MIVEC).
Which is more powerful — Hyundai i10 (AC3) or Mitsubishi Space Star II (A00)?
The strongest Hyundai i10 (AC3) makes 74 kW (101 hp) (1.0 T-GDi N Line); the strongest Mitsubishi Space Star II (A00) 59 kW (80 hp) (1.2 MIVEC).
Other comparisons
i10 (AC3) vs Volkswagen Up (AA)i10 (AC3) vs Toyota Aygo X AB70i10 (AC3) vs Suzuki Ignis III (MF)i10 (AC3) vs Kia Picanto JASpace Star II (A00) vs Suzuki Swift VI (A2L)Space Star II (A00) vs Renault Twingo E-TechSpace Star II (A00) vs Toyota Aygo X AB70Space Star II (A00) vs Suzuki SplashCompare cars →