Ford Transit Mk3-Mk5 or Volkswagen Sharan I (7M)?
1986–2000 vs 1995–2010 · Van vs Minivan
In short
- Length: Transit Mk3-Mk5 4,693 mm, Sharan I (7M) 4,634 mm — a 6 cm difference.
- Boot: Transit Mk3-Mk5 6,000 l, Sharan I (7M) 256 l.
- Lowest consumption: Transit Mk3-Mk5 8.7 l/100 km, Sharan I (7M) 6.3 l/100 km.
- Power: Transit Mk3-Mk5 52–107 kW, Sharan I (7M) 66–150 kW.
- Standard equipment: Transit Mk3-Mk5 9 items (Base), Sharan I (7M) 21 items (Trendline).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Volkswagen Sharan I (7M)1995–2010 · 10 engines · Trendline, Comfortline, Highline, CLSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Ford Transit Mk3-Mk5
1986–2000
Volkswagen Sharan I (7M)
1995–2010
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Ford Transit Mk3-Mk5 or Volkswagen Sharan I (7M)?
Length: Ford Transit Mk3-Mk5 4,693 mm, Volkswagen Sharan I (7M) 4,634 mm (a 59 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,835 vs 2,835 mm. Boot: 6,000 vs 256 l.
Which uses less fuel — Ford Transit Mk3-Mk5 or Volkswagen Sharan I (7M)?
The most frugal Ford Transit Mk3-Mk5 uses 8.7 l/100 km (2.5 TD 100); the most frugal Volkswagen Sharan I (7M) 6.3 l/100 km (1.9 TDI 115).
Which is more powerful — Ford Transit Mk3-Mk5 or Volkswagen Sharan I (7M)?
The strongest Ford Transit Mk3-Mk5 makes 107 kW (145 hp) (2.9 V6 145); the strongest Volkswagen Sharan I (7M) 150 kW (204 hp) (2.8 V6 24V).
Other comparisons
Transit Mk3-Mk5 vs Citroën Jumper I (230/244)Transit Mk3-Mk5 vs Fiat Ducato I (280/290)Transit Mk3-Mk5 vs Citroën Jumpy ITransit Mk3-Mk5 vs Peugeot Expert ISharan I (7M) vs Ford Galaxy I (WGR)Sharan I (7M) vs SEAT Alhambra I (7M)Sharan I (7M) vs Peugeot 807Sharan I (7M) vs Renault Espace IVCompare cars →