Ford Ranger II or Ford Ranger III (T6)?
2006–2011 vs 2011–2022 · Pickup vs Pickup
In short
- Length: Ranger II 5,170 mm, Ranger III (T6) 5,359 mm — a 19 cm difference.
- Boot: Ranger II 1,500 l, Ranger III (T6) 1,210 l.
- Lowest consumption: Ranger II 8.4 l/100 km, Ranger III (T6) 6.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Ranger II 105–115 kW, Ranger III (T6) 92–157 kW.
- Standard equipment: Ranger II 17 items (XL), Ranger III (T6) 23 items (XL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Ford Ranger II
2006–2011
Ford Ranger III (T6)
2011–2022
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Ford Ranger II or Ford Ranger III (T6)?
Length: Ford Ranger III (T6) 5,359 mm, Ford Ranger II 5,170 mm (a 189 mm difference). Wheelbase: 3,220 vs 3,000 mm. Boot: 1,210 vs 1,500 l.
Which uses less fuel — Ford Ranger II or Ford Ranger III (T6)?
The most frugal Ford Ranger II uses 8.4 l/100 km (2.5 TDCi 143); the most frugal Ford Ranger III (T6) 6.5 l/100 km (2.2 TDCi 130).
Which is more powerful — Ford Ranger II or Ford Ranger III (T6)?
The strongest Ford Ranger II makes 115 kW (156 hp) (3.0 TDCi 156); the strongest Ford Ranger III (T6) 157 kW (213 hp) (2.0 EcoBlue 213 Bi-Turbo).
Other comparisons
Ranger II vs Mitsubishi L200 IV (KB Triton)Ranger II vs Toyota Hilux VII (AN10/AN30)Ranger II vs Ford Explorer IV (U251)Ranger II vs Audi Q7 (4L)Ranger III (T6) vs Nissan Navara D23 (NP300)Ranger III (T6) vs Toyota Hilux VIII (AN120)Ranger III (T6) vs Volkswagen Amarok I (2H)Ranger III (T6) vs Fiat Ducato III (250)Compare cars →