Ford Ranger I or Mitsubishi L200 III (K7 Strakar)?
1999–2006 vs 1996–2006 · Pickup vs Pickup
In short
- Length: Ranger I 5,170 mm, L200 III (K7 Strakar) 5,040 mm — a 13 cm difference.
- Lowest consumption: Ranger I 9.4 l/100 km, L200 III (K7 Strakar) 9 l/100 km.
- Power: Ranger I 60–154 kW, L200 III (K7 Strakar) 64–98 kW.
- Standard equipment: Ranger I 14 items (XL), L200 III (K7 Strakar) 20 items (GL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Mitsubishi L200 III (K7 Strakar)1996–2006 · 8 engines · GL, GLX, GLS, MagnumSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Ford Ranger I
1999–2006
Mitsubishi L200 III (K7 Strakar)
1996–2006
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Ford Ranger I or Mitsubishi L200 III (K7 Strakar)?
Length: Ford Ranger I 5,170 mm, Mitsubishi L200 III (K7 Strakar) 5,040 mm (a 130 mm difference). Wheelbase: 3,000 vs 3,000 mm.
Which uses less fuel — Ford Ranger I or Mitsubishi L200 III (K7 Strakar)?
The most frugal Ford Ranger I uses 9.4 l/100 km (2.5 D); the most frugal Mitsubishi L200 III (K7 Strakar) 9 l/100 km (2.5 TD 4WD).
Which is more powerful — Ford Ranger I or Mitsubishi L200 III (K7 Strakar)?
The strongest Ford Ranger I makes 154 kW (209 hp) (4.0 V6); the strongest Mitsubishi L200 III (K7 Strakar) 98 kW (133 hp) (2.5 TD 133 4WD).