Ford Puma (coupe) or Volkswagen Beetle New Beetle (9C)?
1997–2002 vs 1998–2010 · Coupe vs Hatchback 3-door/Convertible
In short
- Length: Puma (coupe) 3,984 mm, Beetle New Beetle (9C) 4,081 mm — a 10 cm difference.
- Boot: Puma (coupe) 265 l, Beetle New Beetle (9C) 209 l.
- Lowest consumption: Puma (coupe) 6.5 l/100 km, Beetle New Beetle (9C) 4.9 l/100 km.
- Power: Puma (coupe) 66–114 kW, Beetle New Beetle (9C) 55–110 kW.
- Standard equipment: Puma (coupe) 19 items (Standard), Beetle New Beetle (9C) 20 items (Base).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Ford Puma (coupe)1997–2002 · 4 engines · Standard, Thunder, Millennium, BlackSpecifications →Listings →
Volkswagen Beetle New Beetle (9C)1998–2010 · 12 engines · Base, Highline, United, ComfortlineSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Ford Puma (coupe)
1997–2002
Volkswagen Beetle New Beetle (9C)
1998–2010
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Ford Puma (coupe) or Volkswagen Beetle New Beetle (9C)?
Length: Volkswagen Beetle New Beetle (9C) 4,081 mm, Ford Puma (coupe) 3,984 mm (a 97 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,508 vs 2,446 mm. Boot: 209 vs 265 l.
Which uses less fuel — Ford Puma (coupe) or Volkswagen Beetle New Beetle (9C)?
The most frugal Ford Puma (coupe) uses 6.5 l/100 km (1.4 16V); the most frugal Volkswagen Beetle New Beetle (9C) 4.9 l/100 km (1.9 TDI 90).
Which is more powerful — Ford Puma (coupe) or Volkswagen Beetle New Beetle (9C)?
The strongest Ford Puma (coupe) makes 114 kW (155 hp) (1.7 16V Racing); the strongest Volkswagen Beetle New Beetle (9C) 110 kW (150 hp) (1.8 T).