Ford Explorer III (U152) or Ford Explorer II (UN105)?
2002–2005 vs 1995–2001 · SUV 5-door vs SUV 5-door/SUV 3-door
In short
- Length: Explorer III (U152) 4,813 mm, Explorer II (UN105) 4,788 mm — a 3 cm difference.
- Boot: Explorer III (U152) 391 l, Explorer II (UN105) 1,206 l.
- Lowest consumption: Explorer III (U152) 14 l/100 km, Explorer II (UN105) 13.2 l/100 km.
- Power: Explorer III (U152) 157–178 kW, Explorer II (UN105) 118–155 kW.
- Standard equipment: Explorer III (U152) 21 items (XLS), Explorer II (UN105) 27 items (XLT).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
better value
Ford Explorer III (U152)
2002–2005
Ford Explorer II (UN105)
1995–2001
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Ford Explorer III (U152) or Ford Explorer II (UN105)?
Length: Ford Explorer III (U152) 4,813 mm, Ford Explorer II (UN105) 4,788 mm (a 25 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,890 vs 2,832 mm. Boot: 391 vs 1,206 l.
Which uses less fuel — Ford Explorer III (U152) or Ford Explorer II (UN105)?
The most frugal Ford Explorer III (U152) uses 14 l/100 km (4.0 V6); the most frugal Ford Explorer II (UN105) 13.2 l/100 km (4.0 V6 SOHC Sport).
Which is more powerful — Ford Explorer III (U152) or Ford Explorer II (UN105)?
The strongest Ford Explorer III (U152) makes 178 kW (242 hp) (4.6 V8); the strongest Ford Explorer II (UN105) 155 kW (211 hp) (4.0 V6 SOHC).
Other comparisons
Explorer III (U152) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 100 (J100)Explorer III (U152) vs Nissan Murano Z50Explorer III (U152) vs Volvo XC90 IExplorer III (U152) vs Mercedes-Benz ML W163Explorer II (UN105) vs Land Rover Range Rover P38AExplorer II (UN105) vs Nissan Pathfinder R50Explorer II (UN105) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 80 (J80)Explorer II (UN105) vs Jeep Grand Cherokee WJCompare cars →