Fiat Punto II (188) or Mitsubishi Colt VI (CJO)?
1999–2005 vs 1996–2003 · Hatchback 5-door/Hatchback 3-door vs Hatchback 3-door/Hatchback 5-door
In short
- Length: Punto II (188) 3,835 mm, Colt VI (CJO) 3,880 mm — a 5 cm difference.
- Boot: Punto II (188) 297 l, Colt VI (CJO) 240 l.
- Lowest consumption: Punto II (188) 4.4 l/100 km, Colt VI (CJO) 6.6 l/100 km.
- Power: Punto II (188) 44–96 kW, Colt VI (CJO) 55–90 kW.
- Standard equipment: Punto II (188) 21 items (Active), Colt VI (CJO) 18 items (GL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Fiat Punto II (188)1999–2005 · 10 engines · Active, Dynamic, Emotion, SportingSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Fiat Punto II (188)
1999–2005
Mitsubishi Colt VI (CJO)
1996–2003
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Fiat Punto II (188) or Mitsubishi Colt VI (CJO)?
Length: Mitsubishi Colt VI (CJO) 3,880 mm, Fiat Punto II (188) 3,835 mm (a 45 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,415 vs 2,460 mm. Boot: 240 vs 297 l.
Which uses less fuel — Fiat Punto II (188) or Mitsubishi Colt VI (CJO)?
The most frugal Fiat Punto II (188) uses 4.4 l/100 km (1.3 Multijet 70); the most frugal Mitsubishi Colt VI (CJO) 6.6 l/100 km (1.3 12V).
Which is more powerful — Fiat Punto II (188) or Mitsubishi Colt VI (CJO)?
The strongest Fiat Punto II (188) makes 96 kW (131 hp) (1.8 16V HGT 130); the strongest Mitsubishi Colt VI (CJO) 90 kW (122 hp) (1.8 GDI).