Fiat Doblo II (Type 263) or Volkswagen Caddy III (2K)?
2010–2022 vs 2003–2015 · Minivan vs Van/Minivan
In short
- Length: Doblo II (Type 263) 4,406 mm, Caddy III (2K) 4,876 mm — a 47 cm difference.
- Boot: Doblo II (Type 263) 790 l, Caddy III (2K) 3,200 l.
- Lowest consumption: Doblo II (Type 263) 4.9 l/100 km, Caddy III (2K) 5.2 l/100 km.
- Power: Doblo II (Type 263) 66–99 kW, Caddy III (2K) 51–103 kW.
- Standard equipment: Doblo II (Type 263) 27 items (Pop), Caddy III (2K) 18 items (Kombi).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Fiat Doblo II (Type 263)2010–2022 · 9 engines · Pop, Easy, Lounge, TrekkingSpecifications →Listings →
Volkswagen Caddy III (2K)2003–2015 · 11 engines · Kombi, Life, Highline, KastenSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Fiat Doblo II (Type 263)
2010–2022
Volkswagen Caddy III (2K)
2003–2015
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Fiat Doblo II (Type 263) or Volkswagen Caddy III (2K)?
Length: Volkswagen Caddy III (2K) 4,876 mm, Fiat Doblo II (Type 263) 4,406 mm (a 470 mm difference). Wheelbase: 3,002 vs 2,755 mm. Boot: 3,200 vs 790 l.
Which uses less fuel — Fiat Doblo II (Type 263) or Volkswagen Caddy III (2K)?
The most frugal Fiat Doblo II (Type 263) uses 4.9 l/100 km (1.3 Multijet 90); the most frugal Volkswagen Caddy III (2K) 5.2 l/100 km (1.6 TDI 75).
Which is more powerful — Fiat Doblo II (Type 263) or Volkswagen Caddy III (2K)?
The strongest Fiat Doblo II (Type 263) makes 99 kW (135 hp) (2.0 Multijet 135); the strongest Volkswagen Caddy III (2K) 103 kW (140 hp) (2.0 TDI 140 4MOTION).
Other comparisons
Doblo II (Type 263) vs Opel Combo DDoblo II (Type 263) vs Peugeot Partner II / Tepee (B9)Doblo II (Type 263) vs Ford Tourneo Connect IIDoblo II (Type 263) vs Peugeot Rifter I (K9)Caddy III (2K) vs Ford Tourneo Connect IICaddy III (2K) vs Peugeot Partner II / Tepee (B9)Caddy III (2K) vs Opel Combo DCompare cars →