Fiat Croma II (Type 194) or Škoda Superb I (3U)?
2005–2011 vs 2001–2008 · Wagon vs Sedan
In short
- Length: Croma II (Type 194) 4,783 mm, Superb I (3U) 4,803 mm — a 2 cm difference.
- Boot: Croma II (Type 194) 500 l, Superb I (3U) 462 l.
- Lowest consumption: Croma II (Type 194) 6 l/100 km, Superb I (3U) 5.5 l/100 km.
- Power: Croma II (Type 194) 88–147 kW, Superb I (3U) 74–142 kW.
- Standard equipment: Croma II (Type 194) 32 items (Active), Superb I (3U) 22 items (Classic).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Fiat Croma II (Type 194)2005–2011 · 7 engines · Active, Dynamic, Emotion, ClassicSpecifications →Listings →
Škoda Superb I (3U)2001–2008 · 9 engines · Classic, Comfort, Elegance, Laurin & KlementSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Fiat Croma II (Type 194)
2005–2011
Škoda Superb I (3U)
2001–2008
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Fiat Croma II (Type 194) or Škoda Superb I (3U)?
Length: Škoda Superb I (3U) 4,803 mm, Fiat Croma II (Type 194) 4,783 mm (a 20 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,803 vs 2,700 mm. Boot: 462 vs 500 l.
Which uses less fuel — Fiat Croma II (Type 194) or Škoda Superb I (3U)?
The most frugal Fiat Croma II (Type 194) uses 6 l/100 km (1.9 Multijet 8V 120); the most frugal Škoda Superb I (3U) 5.5 l/100 km (1.9 TDI 130).
Which is more powerful — Fiat Croma II (Type 194) or Škoda Superb I (3U)?
The strongest Fiat Croma II (Type 194) makes 147 kW (200 hp) (2.4 Multijet 200); the strongest Škoda Superb I (3U) 142 kW (193 hp) (2.8 V6).
Other comparisons
Croma II (Type 194) vs Volkswagen Passat B6Croma II (Type 194) vs Toyota Avensis III (T27)Croma II (Type 194) vs Peugeot 407Croma II (Type 194) vs Renault Laguna IIISuperb I (3U) vs Volkswagen Passat B5Superb I (3U) vs Volvo S80 ISuperb I (3U) vs Ford Mondeo Mk3Superb I (3U) vs Toyota Camry XV30Compare cars →