Citroën Saxo (S0/S1) or Volkswagen Polo III (6N)?
1996–2003 vs 1994–2001 · Hatchback 5-door/Hatchback 3-door vs Hatchback 5-door/Hatchback 3-door/Sedan/Wagon
In short
- Length: Saxo (S0/S1) 3,718 mm, Polo III (6N) 4,285 mm — a 57 cm difference.
- Boot: Saxo (S0/S1) 280 l, Polo III (6N) 455 l.
- Lowest consumption: Saxo (S0/S1) 4.9 l/100 km, Polo III (6N) 4.6 l/100 km.
- Power: Saxo (S0/S1) 37–87 kW, Polo III (6N) 37–92 kW.
- Standard equipment: Saxo (S0/S1) 11 items (X), Polo III (6N) 11 items (CL).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Volkswagen Polo III (6N)1994–2001 · 10 engines · CL, GL, Trendline, ComfortlineSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Citroën Saxo (S0/S1)
1996–2003
Volkswagen Polo III (6N)
1994–2001
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Citroën Saxo (S0/S1) or Volkswagen Polo III (6N)?
Length: Volkswagen Polo III (6N) 4,285 mm, Citroën Saxo (S0/S1) 3,718 mm (a 567 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,443 vs 2,385 mm. Boot: 455 vs 280 l.
Which uses less fuel — Citroën Saxo (S0/S1) or Volkswagen Polo III (6N)?
The most frugal Citroën Saxo (S0/S1) uses 4.9 l/100 km (1.5 D); the most frugal Volkswagen Polo III (6N) 4.6 l/100 km (1.4 TDI).
Which is more powerful — Citroën Saxo (S0/S1) or Volkswagen Polo III (6N)?
The strongest Citroën Saxo (S0/S1) makes 87 kW (118 hp) (1.6 16V VTS); the strongest Volkswagen Polo III (6N) 92 kW (125 hp) (1.6 GTI).