Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290) or Renault Master III?
2006–present vs 2010–2024 · Van vs Van/Minivan
In short
- Length: Jumper II (X250/X290) 5,413 mm, Master III 5,548 mm — a 14 cm difference.
- Boot: Jumper II (X250/X290) 11,500 l, Master III 10,800 l.
- Lowest consumption: Jumper II (X250/X290) 6 l/100 km, Master III 7.2 l/100 km.
- Power: Jumper II (X250/X290) 74–132 kW, Master III 74–132 kW.
- Standard equipment: Jumper II (X250/X290) 19 items (Fourgon), Master III 16 items (Generique).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290)2006–present · 10 engines · Fourgon, Club, Confort, BusinessSpecifications →Listings →
Renault Master III2010–2024 · 10 engines · Generique, Confort, Grand Confort, BusinessSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290)
2006–present
Renault Master III
2010–2024
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290) or Renault Master III?
Length: Renault Master III 5,548 mm, Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290) 5,413 mm (a 135 mm difference). Wheelbase: 3,682 vs 3,450 mm. Boot: 10,800 vs 11,500 l.
Which uses less fuel — Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290) or Renault Master III?
The most frugal Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290) uses 6 l/100 km (2.0 BlueHDi 130); the most frugal Renault Master III 7.2 l/100 km (2.3 Energy dCi 165).
Which is more powerful — Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290) or Renault Master III?
The strongest Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290) makes 132 kW (179 hp) (2.2 BlueHDi 180 EAT8); the strongest Renault Master III 132 kW (179 hp) (2.3 Energy dCi 180).