Citroën Jumper I (230/244) or Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290)?
1994–2006 vs 2006–present · Van vs Van
In short
- Length: Jumper I (230/244) 4,655 mm, Jumper II (X250/X290) 5,413 mm — a 76 cm difference.
- Boot: Jumper I (230/244) 7,500 l, Jumper II (X250/X290) 11,500 l.
- Lowest consumption: Jumper I (230/244) 8 l/100 km, Jumper II (X250/X290) 6 l/100 km.
- Power: Jumper I (230/244) 51–107 kW, Jumper II (X250/X290) 74–132 kW.
- Standard equipment: Jumper I (230/244) 12 items (Fourgon), Jumper II (X250/X290) 19 items (Fourgon).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290)2006–present · 10 engines · Fourgon, Club, Confort, BusinessSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Citroën Jumper I (230/244)
1994–2006
Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290)
2006–present
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Citroën Jumper I (230/244) or Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290)?
Length: Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290) 5,413 mm, Citroën Jumper I (230/244) 4,655 mm (a 758 mm difference). Wheelbase: 3,450 vs 2,850 mm. Boot: 11,500 vs 7,500 l.
Which uses less fuel — Citroën Jumper I (230/244) or Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290)?
The most frugal Citroën Jumper I (230/244) uses 8 l/100 km (1.9 TD); the most frugal Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290) 6 l/100 km (2.0 BlueHDi 130).
Which is more powerful — Citroën Jumper I (230/244) or Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290)?
The strongest Citroën Jumper I (230/244) makes 107 kW (145 hp) (2.8 HDi 146); the strongest Citroën Jumper II (X250/X290) 132 kW (179 hp) (2.2 BlueHDi 180 EAT8).
Other comparisons
Jumper I (230/244) vs Ford Transit Mk3-Mk5Jumper I (230/244) vs Volkswagen Sharan I (7M)Jumper I (230/244) vs Citroën Jumpy IJumper I (230/244) vs Fiat Ducato II (230)Jumper II (X250/X290) vs Fiat Ducato III (250)Jumper II (X250/X290) vs Renault Master IIIJumper II (X250/X290) vs Ford Transit Mk7Compare cars →