Alfa Romeo 166 936 (166) or Fiat Croma II (Type 194)?
1998–2007 vs 2005–2011 · Sedan vs Wagon
In short
- Length: 166 936 (166) 4,720 mm, Croma II (Type 194) 4,783 mm — a 6 cm difference.
- Lowest consumption: 166 936 (166) 6.9 l/100 km, Croma II (Type 194) 6 l/100 km.
- Power: 166 936 (166) 100–162 kW, Croma II (Type 194) 88–147 kW.
- Standard equipment: 166 936 (166) 29 items (Progression), Croma II (Type 194) 32 items (Active).
- Neither is listed on Autodrom right now.
Alfa Romeo 166 936 (166)1998–2007 · 4 engines · Progression, Distinctive, SuperSpecifications →Listings →
Fiat Croma II (Type 194)2005–2011 · 7 engines · Active, Dynamic, Emotion, ClassicSpecifications →Listings →
better value
Alfa Romeo 166 936 (166)
1998–2007
Fiat Croma II (Type 194)
2005–2011
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger — Alfa Romeo 166 936 (166) or Fiat Croma II (Type 194)?
Length: Fiat Croma II (Type 194) 4,783 mm, Alfa Romeo 166 936 (166) 4,720 mm (a 63 mm difference). Wheelbase: 2,700 vs 2,700 mm. Boot: 500 vs 500 l.
Which uses less fuel — Alfa Romeo 166 936 (166) or Fiat Croma II (Type 194)?
The most frugal Alfa Romeo 166 936 (166) uses 6.9 l/100 km (2.4 JTD 20V 175); the most frugal Fiat Croma II (Type 194) 6 l/100 km (1.9 Multijet 8V 120).
Which is more powerful — Alfa Romeo 166 936 (166) or Fiat Croma II (Type 194)?
The strongest Alfa Romeo 166 936 (166) makes 162 kW (220 hp) (3.0 V6 24V 220); the strongest Fiat Croma II (Type 194) 147 kW (200 hp) (2.4 Multijet 200).
Other comparisons
166 936 (166) vs Kia Optima I / Magentis (MS)166 936 (166) vs Peugeot 407166 936 (166) vs Honda Accord VII (CL/CN)166 936 (166) vs Toyota Camry XV30Croma II (Type 194) vs Volkswagen Passat B6Croma II (Type 194) vs Toyota Avensis III (T27)Croma II (Type 194) vs Peugeot 407Croma II (Type 194) vs Renault Laguna IIICompare cars →